Amy Jo Kim, community architect and co-founder of Shufflebrain, closed out the conference with an incredibly actionable talk, in which she delivered us the tools and language we need in order to build collaborative community spaces.
Amy is one of the true leaders in collaborative design and product creation. Her company, Shufflebrain, specialize in early-stage design and innovation. They’ve built hugely successful games like Rock Band, Covet Fashion, and The Sims, just to name a few.
“At first, I didn’t know how to tell if a game would be a success or not, but over time, I realized that the cooperative games were really winning out,” she said. We can apply her knowledge of collaborative design to building out collaborative community spaces where we can build movements together around brands and causes.
In 2000, Amy wrote a book titled Community Building on the Web, in which she defined nine design strategies for building community. All of these work as a checklist of things we should be checking off as we build our own communities. They are:
Next, Amy walked us briefly through the membership lifecycle. This can be incorporated into the product itself to engender deeper engagement. We’ve seen Jeff Atwood reference this lifecycle before when talking about building Stack Exchange and Discourse.
Amy also outlined how community members tend to engage with your product, as follows:
Discovery -> onboarding -> habits -> mastery
In this process, not everyone is motivated by zero-sum mechanics. This is where collaboration comes in.
According to Amy, Game Theory 101 for communities can be defined as: “Structured experiences with rules and goals that are fun to play with everyone.”
“This is a game in which we are partners, not opponents. We win together and lose together. The point is to play and build relationships,” she said. These are the most rewarding experiences to be a part of.
There are five core tactics to design for collaborative community experiences. Amy explained each one of them, breaking them down and sharing how we might think about them as we build community.
1. Compete with the System. Create competition with the system, not with other players.
Ask yourself: How can we define what we are not so that we can work together as a community to overcome the problem we’re solving for?
2. Introduce shared resources and gathering tools (i.e. the current “It girl” of collaboration, Slack). Shared resources can include a shared online space, shared resources within that space, and shared points in games like Rock Band.
Ask yourself: What can we share in our community that will bring us closer together? How can we create a space where we are willing to share and do not see our resources as scarce?
3. Create interdependent roles. For example, create judges and enforcers or writers and editors.
Ask yourself: What distinct roles can my community members play and how can I begin to segment them and explain these roles as part of our community story?
4. Cooperative social gestures. This is positive social reinforcement, like kudos, likes, and retweets on Twitter. Sharing and donating is also a part of this. Negative feedback is dangerous and has no real place in a cooperative environment.
Ask yourself: what positive social gestures can we incorporate into the community and display for our users? What negative feedback patterns can we eliminate (i.e. downvoting)?
5. Non-zero sum stats. Put the “we” into your leaderboards. Nike does a great job of this. They give overall community stats rather than competitive stats. Collective achievement is very powerful. Spotlighting can be more powerful than leaderboards and winners.
Ask yourself: How can I create an incentive-based badging system? How can people work together to achieve things in our community?
“Communities shape how we see the world,” Amy said. “So seize the opportunity to build strong communities. Think co-op first. Bring people together around shared goals.”
One of our members, Chloe Good from Campus, asked, “Is there a product that works like a shell where communities can work together to accomplish things?” Amy’s response was that nothing like this exists, but her dream is that one of us will create such an open collaborative platform for inciting movements.